New Jersey Divorce Retirement

At the time of their New Jersey divorce, he was 62 and had already received notice terminating his employment. He also had made known his intent to retire at age 65. He had been unable to find new employment and was subsisting on Social Security payments, paying alimony only by drawing on the equity in his real estate holdings. Under these circumstances, it was error to deny his application to reduce/eliminate his alimony obligation [1] without a hearing, [2] without considering critical evidence and [3] without evidentiary support on significant factual issues.  Moore v. Moore, New Jersey App. Div., September 9, 2005