HACKENSACK NEW JERSEY DIVORCE LAWYER APPEALS

The ex-husband claimed the New Jersey divorce judge erred by (1) failing to give him an opportunity to develop his case by not ensuring he received information requested during discovery and pre-trial conferences; (2) failing to equitably distribute the marital assets, precluding him from participating in the discussion of his pension and erring his valuing the marital home; and (3) failing to consider the best interests of the parties' son. These contentions are rejected and the decision is affirmed. Bailey v. Bailey, New Jersey App. Div. June 20, 2007