Google Search


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

« SUMMIT NEW JERSEY UNION COUNTY DIVORCE MEDIATION LAWYER LIMITED DURATION ALIMONY ARBITRATION | Main | SOUTH ORANGE NEW JERSEY ESSEX COUNTY DIVORCE LAWYER CHILD SUPPORT »

CHATHAM NEW JERSEY MORRIS COUNTY DIVORCE MEDIATION DISCOVERY EVIDENCE LAWYER

Hackensack_new_jersey_divorce_media The New Jersey divorce judge was correct (a) in deciding that the ex-husband breached the parties' New Jersey divorce agreement and (b) in denying his application for relief because his requests had already been previously decided in a 2002 trial. Moreover, several of the prior rulings had already been appealed and reviewed. Although the ex-husband now claims that his ex-wife suppressed evidence at trial, his request for relief is clearly time-barred and relief is not available without exceptional and compelling circumstances which are not present.      Jones v. Jones, New Jersey App. Div., September 24, 2007