The New Jersey divorce judge should have conducted a plenary hearing to determine whether the parties' 18 year old son was still financially dependent on his parents. Tarquini v. Tarquini, New Jersey App. Div., November 10, 2011
Categories
- Adoption
- Adultery
- Agreements
- Alimony
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Annulment
- Appeals
- Arbitration
- Bankruptcy
- Books
- Business Valuation
- Case Information Statement
- Celebrity Divorces
- Child Custody
- Child Removal & Relocation
- Child Support
- Child Support Guidelines
- Child Visitation
- Cohabitation
- College Expenses
- Constitution
- Counsel Fees
- Criminal
- Current Affairs
- Custody
- Deposition
- Discovery
- Divorce Grounds
- Domestic Violence
- Emancipation
- Engagement
- Equitable Distribution
- Estate & Post-Death
- Evidence
- Experts
- Fraud
- General
- Gifts
- Grandparent Visitation
- Guardianship
- Immigration
- Immunity
- Imputed Income
- In The News
- Insurance
- International
- Jurisdiction
- Legal Fees
- Legislation
- Limited Duration Alimony
- Marital Life Style
- Marital Premises
- Mediation
- MILITARY
- Miscellaneous
- Modification
- Palimony
- Parenting
- Partition
- Paternity
- Pendente Lite
- Personal Injury & Torts
- Personal Property
- Pets
- Practice & Procedure
- Prenuptial Agreements
- Private Investigation
- QDRO
- Religion
- Relocation & Removal
- Retirement
- Same Sex Marriage
- Sanctions
- Social Security
- STOCK OPTIONS
- Surrogate Parenting
- Taxation
- Temporary Support
- Testimony & Witnesses
- Torts
- Trusts
- Unmarried Relationships
- Visitation
- Weddings
- Wills, Death, Estate Planning
- Wiretap
