The doctrine of contra proferentum might apply in this case, after a full review of the circumstances under which the New Jersey divorce agreement was negotiated, with particular emphasis on whether unequal bargaining power existed. Maoz v. Maoz, New Jersey App. Div., February 15, 2012
Categories
- Adoption
- Adultery
- Agreements
- Alimony
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Annulment
- Appeals
- Arbitration
- Bankruptcy
- Books
- Business Valuation
- Case Information Statement
- Celebrity Divorces
- Child Custody
- Child Removal & Relocation
- Child Support
- Child Support Guidelines
- Child Visitation
- Cohabitation
- College Expenses
- Constitution
- Counsel Fees
- Criminal
- Current Affairs
- Custody
- Discovery
- Divorce Grounds
- Domestic Violence
- Emancipation
- Engagement
- Equitable Distribution
- Estate & Post-Death
- Evidence
- Experts
- Fraud
- General
- Gifts
- Grandparent Visitation
- Guardianship
- Immigration
- Immunity
- Imputed Income
- In The News
- Insurance
- International
- Jurisdiction
- Legal Fees
- Legislation
- Limited Duration Alimony
- Marital Life Style
- Marital Premises
- Mediation
- MILITARY
- Miscellaneous
- Modification
- Palimony
- Parenting
- Partition
- Paternity
- Pendente Lite
- Personal Injury & Torts
- Personal Property
- Pets
- Practice & Procedure
- Prenuptial Agreements
- Private Investigation
- QDRO
- Religion
- Relocation & Removal
- Retirement
- Same Sex Marriage
- Sanctions
- Social Security
- STOCK OPTIONS
- Surrogate Parenting
- Taxation
- Temporary Support
- Torts
- Trusts
- Unmarried Relationships
- Visitation
- Wills, Death, Estate Planning
- Wiretap
