Ordinarily, the payment of New Jerseyalimony is secured by life insurance on the life of the payor. Here, however, the 68-year old retired ex-husband was permitted to substitute an equivalent lien against his estate, thereby obviating the ongoing cost of the insurance premiums.Barton v. Barton, New Jersey App. Div., June 1, 2012
The ex-husband may be entitled to a trial on the issue of whether alimony payments to the ex-wife should be reduced or terminated, given (a) her acquiring her mother's home for $1 and (b) her residence in that same home, along with both her son and her sister.Maybury v. Maybury, New Jersey App. Div., May 31, 2012
At the time of their New Jersey divorce in 2005, the parties failed to agree on the dependency tax exemption benefits allocable to their 3 children. As a result, they have continued to litigate over this issue over the last 7 years.Zera v. Krushinski, New Jersey App. Div., May 30, 2012
Even though the New Jersey divorce judge denied the father's motion to terminate child support for his 20 year old daughter, this was without prejudice to his right to compel an audit of the child support account. Heffernan v. Heffernan, New Jersey App. Div., May 29, 2012
Although the New Jersey divorce judge concluded that the mother did not engage in acts of child abuse and neglect, the Law Guardian for the child disagreed and appealed. The Appellate Division agrees with the Guardian and reverses.In The Matter of D.G., Jr., New Jersey Appellate Division, May 25, 2012
Under New Jersey divorce law, the right of the occupant spouse to exclusive possession of the former marital home [subject to a deferred sale or mortgage pay-off] is not merely an aspect of equitable distribution but also constitutes a contribution by the nonoccupant spouse to the support of the custodial parent and of the children.Sadej v. Sadej, New Jersey App. Div., May 23, 2012
Mark Zuckerberg was married one day after his Facebook IPO. Was this done intentionally so that his stock holdings---premarital assets---would be immune and exempt from distribution in the event of a subsequent divorce?May 22, 2012
A New Jersey divorce litigant may be surcharged for dissipation of marital assets if she/he "uses marital property for his or her own benefit and for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage relationship was in serious jeopardy.'"Curley v. Curley, New Jersey App. Div., May 21, 2012