As the McGreevey divorce trial enters its 3d week, the salacious stuff that made the case the talk of gossip sheets --- the 3-way sex, the gay affairs--- is still a way off. That's going to come in part 3, with Dina Matos McGreevey's $600,000 claim she was defrauded into a marriage of political convenience by a gay man. For now, the case continues in the 2d phase, the financial section. But to New Jersey divorce lawyers, this is her best shot of getting any significant money, with a decent chance of emerging with an alimony award. "That may be her strongest argument," said Charles Abut, who was named one of the state's Top 100 Lawyers by New Jersey Monthly. "This really is the main event for her." And as to Matos McGreevey's fraud claim, that she had no inkling of his homosexuality and that he knowingly duped her? "Can I use a Texas expression? That dog won't hunt," Abut said. The Newark Star Ledger, May 15, 2008