Google Search


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Electronic Wiretap

A wife illegally intercepted her husband's communications with another woman via email and instant messaging when she installed a spyware program on his computer. This software simultaneously  (1) copied his communications in real time as they were being transmitted (2)took screen shots and (3) stored them to a new file. O'Brien v. O'Brien, Florida 5th District Court of Appeals, March 1, 2005http://www.5dca.org/Opinions/Opin2005/020705/5D03-3484.pdf

Marital Infidelity

Is marital "dirty linen" only laundered in divorce court? As jury selection got under way this week in the criminal prosecution against ex-WorldCom CEO Bernard Ebbers, the defense won an initial round when the trial judge granted a motion to allow inquiry into the "marital infidelity" of Scott Sullivan, who used to be WorldCom's CFO and is now the prosecution's star witness. The judge agreed with the theory that Sullivan's credibility is now in issue and that allowing "adultery" testimony is relevant to test that credibility. January 24, 2005

http://money.cnn.com/2005/01/18/news/newsmakers/ebbers_trial.reut/

New Jersey Divorce : Evidence

Along with Judge Michael Diamond and Judge John Selser, Charles C. Abut, Esq. will be a featured speaker at a continuing legal education seminar, "Evidence For Family Lawyers" in Fairfield, New Jersey. In an interactive format, experienced matrimonial practitioners will be presented with a series of factual vignettes to demonstrate evidence issues arising in divorce litigation. After presenting each scenario, the panelists will discuss the admissibility [or not] of each item of evidence and offer practical guidance on how to handle similar situations in Court. New Jersey Institute For Continuing Legal Education, January 11, 2005.

New Jersey Divorce : Hearsay & Excited Utterances

Rodrigues v. Rosenblatt, 58 N.J. 281 (1971), requires the assignment of counsel to an indigent before incarceration based on a violation of a domestic violence restraining order.  Here, the conviction was based on the testimony of a responding police officer who reported the hearsay excited utterance of defendant’s former girlfriend. On retrial, the Family Part is directed to  consider the impact of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) as to admissibility of the statement. State v. Ashford, ___N.J. Super.___ (App. Div. 2004); 2004 WL 2921881;December 20, 2004.