Google Search


May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

BERGEN COUNTY DIVORCE MEDIATOR

Images1_13 Wife's real estate appraisal witness, who performed appraisal update 21 months after another appraiser from his firm had conducted original appraisal, lacked knowledge of essential facts needed to qualify him to form an expert opinion on value of residential property where witness did not personally inspect the interior of the structures and did not personally view the property, not even from a distance, but instead relied on facts from original appraisal report which had been excluded from evidence.  Porter v. Thrane, 98 Conn. App. 336, 908 A.2d 1137, December 21, 2006  

http://www.jud.state.ct.us/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP98/98AP451.pdf

BASKING RIDGE DIVORCE MEDIATOR

Witness_stand The plaintiff had retained defendant as a handwriting expert, but when defendant failed to appear atthe New Jersey trial, judgment was entered against plaintiff, and she sued to recover the monies she had paid defendant. The New Jersey trial judge, finding plaintiff to be a credible witness, and concluding that defendant was not forthcoming, justly awarded plaintiff the amount she had paid defendant, less the amount attributable to his report, which he had issued.    Azizi v. Phillips, New Jersey App. Div., December 6, 2006

NEW JERSEY DIVORCE LAWYER : BATTERED WOMEN SYNDROME

Can26x73 In a prosecution for the murder of defendant's girlfriend, the trial court properly admitted expert testimony about the common characteristics of battered women and battered women's syndrome. The failure to issue a limiting instruction on the use of the expert's testimony was harmless error. Also, the 20-year delay between the date of the crime and the date of the indictment did not violate due process.    State v. Townsend, New Jersey Supreme Ct., ___ N.J.___ (2006); May 5, 2006

Barring The New Jersey Expert

Images15_1 Can you successfully bar the testimony of a vocational expert in New Jersey divorce cases? You can. And that was the result here. Both the expert's testimony and the expert's report were precluded. Why? Because they were not submitted until after the expiration of the discovery end date and because the "explanations" for the lateness were unjustified.  Repa v. Thompson, New Jersey Law Div., October 5, 2005

New Jersey Divorce : Disappearing Expert

Many New Jersey divorce cases involve expert witnesses. These can be accountants, appraisers, doctors, mental health professionals or others. What happens if the particular expert selected for the litigation is not available when it comes time for trial and the client then claims damages as a result of the expert's absence? A malpractice case from Morris County was just dismissed and held neither the expert nor the client's lawyers responsible. Judge W. Hunt Dumont dismissed the malpractice case, because the scheduling mix-up wasn't the expert's fault. Further, the lawyers hadn't violated any professional standards and the client failed to prove that the expert's nonappearance cost him money.

Kranz v. Tiger, MRS-L-3661-00, New Jersey Law Division, Morris County, December 23, 2004.