The New Jersey divorce judge should not resolve factual disputes on the basis of conflicting certifications purporting to demonstrate whether the ex-wife was "residing with an unrelated person," which, pursuant to a clause in the Property Settlement Agreement, would be grounds for termination of alimony payments. Moreover, the language of such a clause must be construed reasonably, so as not to reach an absurd result and so as not to ignore the qualification in Konzelman v. Konzelman, that a mere romantic, casual or social relationship is not sufficient to justify the enforcement of a provision terminating alimony. Palmieri v. Palmieri, ___ N.J. ___ (App. Div. 2006); New Jersey App. Div., October 31, 2006