This was an acrimonious New Jersey divorce case, where the New Jersey divorce judge erred in concluding the wife's attempt to "revisit the circumstances of her removal from the former marital home" was barred by res judicata. Although the issue was pursued actively, there was never a ruling on the merits, i.e., whether the wife, in fact, violated the terms of the New Jersey judgment of divorce by changing the locks on the home and otherwise refusing the husband access. The judge's award of counsel fees to the husband was a mistaken exercise of discretion. Chan v. Huie, New Jersey App. Div. September 20, 2007