| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 |
« March 2016 | Main | May 2016 »
It’s tax time. If you received alimony pursuant to a court order or an agreement, you may be liable for income taxes. Did you pay quarterly estimated taxes on the alimony received? If not, you may be in for a hefty tax bill. § 71, Internal Revenue Code; April 12, 2016
The 3 children of this New Jersey divorced couple and both parents were ordered to "cooperate" with a Parenting Coordinator, abide by her recommendations and then "return" to a psychologist for updated evaluations. These rulings resulted in an appeal and are reversed for a remand. Parish, Jr. v. Kluger, New Jersey App. Div., April 6, 2016
This divorced New Jersey couple had various unresolved income tax issues, necessitating this appeal. These included joint vs. separate filings, IRA withdrawals, tax withholding, a draft tax return vs. an unsigned version and more. DeProspo v. DeProspo, New Jersey App. Div., March 29, 2016
The New Jersey divorce judge took no testimony, made no findings and did not issue a written or oral decision, in denying the mother's application to relocate from New Jersey with the parties' 3 year-old child. On appeal, this ruling is reversed and remanded for a full hearing. Vitolo v. Sabba, March 18, 2016
The mere mention of someone's name in a Facebook post might constitute a communication sufficient to violate a matrimonial or family restraining order. Here, the defendant, a disgruntled ex-wife who used Facebook to "tag" her former sister-in-law, now faces one year of jail time. People v. Gonzalez, New York Sup. Ct., March 9, 2016
These 3 New Jersey friends agreed to conceive and jointly raise a child, in a tri-parenting arrangement. After a trial, the New Jersey divorce judge awarded joint legal and residential custody to all three parents, while denying the application of one of them to relocate to another state with the child. D.G. and S.H. v. K.S., New Jersey App. Div., February 29, 2016
The mother stated “"many times, that she will never allow [the father] to see the subject child and that she would do whatever it takes to keep the subject child away" from him. Under these circumstances, it was appropriate to suspend the father's current child support obligations. Coull v. Rottman, N.Y. App. Div., February 17, 2016