In a highly unusual appellate intervention, the Supreme Court of New Jersey just ordered [with two Justices dissenting] an incarcerated father released from jail, apparently agreeing that he does not have the current ability to pay the amounts of alimony and child support ordered by the Family Part judge.New Jersey Law Journal, December 11, 2012
Not only was the New Jersey divorce judge reversed for failing to provide adequate explanations for her rulings, but on remand, the case must be heard by a different judge.Ducey v. Ducey, New Jersey App. Div., February 24, 2012
In New Jersey divorce appellate proceedings, issues not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned and therefore dismissed.Solomon v. Solomon, December 20, 2011